2006 BMW M6 vs. 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2006 BMW M6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 362 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 2006 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 487 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (218 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M6 | 2004 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | M6 | Grand Voyager |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2429 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 12.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 100 L |
