2006 BMW M6 vs. 2008 Daihatsu Copen
To start off, 2008 Daihatsu Copen is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 421 more horse power than 2008 Daihatsu Copen. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Daihatsu Copen.
Because 2008 Daihatsu Copen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daihatsu Copen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 584 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daihatsu Copen. (121 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daihatsu Copen. 2006 BMW M6 has automatic transmission and 2008 Daihatsu Copen has manual transmission. 2008 Daihatsu Copen will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW M6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M6 | 2008 Daihatsu Copen | |
| Make | BMW | Daihatsu |
| Model | M6 | Copen |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1298 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 86 HP |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |
