2006 BMW M6 vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Honda HR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Honda HR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 570 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (135 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V. 2006 BMW M6 has automatic transmission and 2008 Honda HR-V has manual transmission. 2008 Honda HR-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW M6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW M6 | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | M6 | HR-V |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 507 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 705 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 13 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |
