2006 BMW M6 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 362 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 524 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (181 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3. 2006 BMW M6 has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 BMW M6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M6 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 705 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 9.8 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |