2006 BMW M6 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 292 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Commander. (215 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Jeep Commander. (510 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | M6 | Commander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5000 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 507 HP | 215 HP |
Torque | 705 Nm | 510 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 17.7:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 4.6 seconds | 9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 80 L |