2006 BMW M6 vs. 2010 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2010 Lincoln MKS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 4,997 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (500 HP @ 7750 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 2010 Lincoln MKS. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Lincoln MKS.
Because 2006 BMW M6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW M6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Lincoln MKS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (519 Nm @ 6100 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Lincoln MKS. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Lincoln MKS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW M6 | 2010 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | BMW | Lincoln |
Model | M6 | MKS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4997 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 7750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 519 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6100 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5184 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2868 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 76 L |