2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 1964 Jaguar E-Type
To start off, 2006 BMW MM Roadster is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1964 Jaguar E-Type. (265 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 1964 Jaguar E-Type.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Jaguar E-Type (385 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1964 Jaguar E-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 1964 Jaguar E-Type | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | MM Roadster | E-Type |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 4235 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 385 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |