2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2006 BMW MM Roadster is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Cadillac CTS-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Cadillac CTS-V would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS-V (529 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2003 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | MM Roadster | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 529 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 66 L |
