2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2004 Chevrolet Suburban
To start off, 2006 BMW MM Roadster is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Suburban. (295 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Suburban.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Suburban (447 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2004 Chevrolet Suburban | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | MM Roadster | Suburban |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 447 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3310 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 117 L |