2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2004 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2006 BMW MM Roadster is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (190 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (355 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2006 BMW MM Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2004 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | MM Roadster | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |