2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 BMW MM Roadster is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. (282 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | MM Roadster | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 355 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 19.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 100 L |