2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (536 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | MM Roadster | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 83 L |