2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 3,245 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW MM Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. (261 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt. (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW MM Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2009 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | MM Roadster | Cobalt |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 49 L |