2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe. (310 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | MM Roadster | Tahoe |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 310 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 98 L |
