2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (527 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | MM Roadster | Commander |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 527 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |