2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe. (320 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe (454 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2010 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | MM Roadster | Tahoe |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 454 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2007 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1953 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 98 L |