2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Murano. (265 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Murano. (336 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 BMW MM Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | MM Roadster | Murano |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 82 L |