2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 3,245 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW MM Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2013 Jaguar XF. (237 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jaguar XF. (340 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW MM Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | MM Roadster | XF |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3245 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 355 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2909 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
