2006 BMW X3 vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5

To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X3 (189 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X3 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1960 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X3 (246 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Jeep CJ5.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW X3 1960 Jeep CJ5
Make BMW Jeep
Model X3 CJ5
Year Released 2006 1960
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2494 cc 2197 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 189 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 246 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2060 mm