2006 BMW X3 vs. 1979 Lancia Beta
To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X3 (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1979 Lancia Beta. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1979 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X3 weights approximately 885 kg more than 1979 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Lancia Beta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X3 (410 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Lancia Beta. (171 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X3 | 1979 Lancia Beta | |
Make | BMW | Lancia |
Model | X3 | Beta |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.9 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1925 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 59 L |