2006 BMW X3 vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X3 weights approximately 925 kg more than 1983 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW X3 | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | X3 | XJR |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2983 cc | 5343 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 90 L |
