2006 BMW X3 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW X3 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | BMW | Caterham |
| Model | X3 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 36 L |
