2006 BMW X3 vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 490 kg more than 2006 BMW X3.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW X3. (291 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X3 | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3510 mm |