2006 BMW X3 vs. 2003 Caterham 7
To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 BMW X3. (189 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X3 weights approximately 870 kg more than 2003 Caterham 7.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X3 (246 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Caterham 7. (210 Nm @ 5750 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X3 | 2003 Caterham 7 | |
Make | BMW | Caterham |
Model | X3 | 7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 246 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 3110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2230 mm |