2006 BMW X3 vs. 2004 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2006 BMW X3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Honda CR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Honda CR-V would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2004 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Honda CR-V weights approximately 118 kg more than 2006 BMW X3.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X3 (300 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Honda CR-V. (218 Nm). This means 2006 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Honda CR-V.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW X3 2004 Honda CR-V
Make BMW Honda
Model X3 CR-V
Year Released 2006 2004
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2977 cc 2359 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 228 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 218 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 9.6:1
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1360 kg 1478 kg
Vehicle Length 4570 mm 4540 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption 9.4 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.1 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 L 58 L