2006 BMW X3 vs. 2008 Isuzu I-290
To start off, 2008 Isuzu I-290 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X3 (227 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (185 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Isuzu I-290. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X3 (291 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Isuzu I-290. (258 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Isuzu I-290.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X3 | 2008 Isuzu I-290 | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | X3 | I-290 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 227 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 291 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 74 L |