2006 BMW X3 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X3 weights approximately 379 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Because 2006 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Toyota Condor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X3 (291 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X3 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | X3 | Condor |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2983 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 291 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1825 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 70 L |