2006 BMW X5 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 BMW X5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X5 (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2006 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | 62 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2981 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 98.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 79 L |