2006 BMW X5 vs. 1980 Zastava 750
To start off, 2006 BMW X5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,981 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X5 (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X5 weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1980 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X5 (290 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 1980 Zastava 750 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | X5 | 750 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 2981 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 30 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 51 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |