2006 BMW X5 vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 2006 BMW X5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,981 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X5 (225 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X5 weights approximately 1195 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X5 (290 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | X5 | 750 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2981 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2010 mm |