2006 BMW X5 vs. 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo
To start off, 2006 BMW X5 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2006 BMW X5. (181 HP @ 2000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X5 weights approximately 535 kg more than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Because 2006 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X5 (410 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo. (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 1986 Maserati Bi Turbo | |
Make | BMW | Maserati |
Model | X5 | Bi Turbo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2510 mm |