2006 BMW X5 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2006 BMW X5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X5 (315 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 118 kg more than 2006 BMW X5.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW X5. (439 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW X5 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
| Make | BMW | GMC |
| Model | X5 | Savana |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5326 cc |
| Horse Power | 315 HP | 295 HP |
| Torque | 439 Nm | 448 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 2353 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3440 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 117 L |
