2006 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Toyota Aygo
To start off, 2008 Toyota Aygo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,392 cc, 2006 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X5 (315 HP) has 262 more horse power than 2008 Toyota Aygo. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2008 Toyota Aygo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X5 weights approximately 1345 kg more than 2008 Toyota Aygo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Toyota Aygo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW X5 (439 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Aygo. (132 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Aygo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 2008 Toyota Aygo | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | X5 | Aygo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 1398 cc |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 439 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3405 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1615 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 3.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 4.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 35 L |