2006 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2012 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Challenger (376 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 BMW X5. (315 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW X5 weights approximately 383 kg more than 2012 Dodge Challenger.
Because 2006 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Dodge Challenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Challenger (555 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW X5. (439 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 2012 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | X5 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5700 cc |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Torque | 439 Nm | 555 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5022 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 72 L |