2006 BMW X5 vs. 2012 GMC Savana
To start off, 2012 GMC Savana is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW X5 (315 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2012 GMC Savana. (310 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2012 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Savana weights approximately 325 kg more than 2006 BMW X5.
Because 2006 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 GMC Savana. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Savana (452 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW X5. (439 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW X5 | 2012 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | X5 | Savana |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 5300 cc |
Horse Power | 315 HP | 310 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 439 Nm | 452 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2235 kg | 2560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2012 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2126 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 92 L | 117 L |