2006 BMW Z4 vs. 1953 Buick 40
To start off, 2006 BMW Z4 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW Z4 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1953 Buick 40. (123 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1953 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2006 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW Z4. (301 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 BMW Z4 | 1953 Buick 40 | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | Z4 | 40 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4315 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 304 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 104.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1365 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 3090 mm |
