2006 BMW Z4 vs. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 2006 BMW Z4 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2006 BMW Z4. (189 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 255 kg more than 2006 BMW Z4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW Z4 | 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | Z4 | Arcadia |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 3206 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4960 mm |