2006 BMW Z4 vs. 2003 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2006 BMW Z4 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 BMW Z4. (255 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW Z4 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2003 Jaguar XK.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar XK (393 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW Z4. (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2003 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW Z4.

Compare all specifications:

2006 BMW Z4 2003 Jaguar XK
Make BMW Jaguar
Model Z4 XK
Year Released 2006 2003
Body Type Coupe Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2999 cc 3996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 255 HP 290 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 393 Nm
Torque RPM 2750 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1835 kg 1700 kg
Vehicle Length 4100 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1270 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 75 L