2006 BMW Z4 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2006 BMW Z4. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2006 BMW Z4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 BMW Z4 weights approximately 13 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX.
Because 2006 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW Z4 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | BMW | Acura |
Model | Z4 | CSX |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.6 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |