2006 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,424 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Cadillac 62 (267 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2006 Buick LaCrosse. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Buick LaCrosse. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2006 Buick LaCrosse. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1955 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Buick LaCrosse | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | LaCrosse | 62 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3785 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 267 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3290 mm |