2006 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 194 kg more than 2006 Buick LaCrosse.
Because 1963 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Buick LaCrosse | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Buick | Cadillac |
| Model | LaCrosse | 62 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3556 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1946 kg | 2140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 79 L |
