2006 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS

To start off, 2006 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 3,555 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick LaCrosse (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 1326 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 NSU 1000 LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick LaCrosse (305 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Buick LaCrosse 1963 NSU 1000 LS
Make Buick NSU
Model LaCrosse 1000 LS
Year Released 2006 1963
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 3555 cc 996 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 42 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 70 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 94 mm 69 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 66.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 8.0:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1946 kg 620 kg
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 3790 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1490 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 34 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]