2006 Buick LaCrosse vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2006 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,785 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick LaCrosse (200 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 890 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Buick LaCrosse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Buick LaCrosse | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Buick | DAF |
Model | LaCrosse | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2006 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3785 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 26 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 33 L |