2006 Buick Lucerne vs. 2013 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Buick Lucerne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Buick Lucerne would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Buick Lucerne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick Lucerne (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (269 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick Lucerne should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda CX-9.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Lucerne (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Lucerne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda CX-9.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Buick Lucerne | 2013 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Lucerne | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 269 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5170 mm | 5108 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1728 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 76 L |