2006 Buick Rainier vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Buick Rainier is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Buick Rainier (291 HP) has 221 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick Rainier weights approximately 806 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Rainier (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 274 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Buick Rainier | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Buick | MCC |
Model | Rainier | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 376 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1810 mm |