2006 Buick Rainier vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Buick Rainier would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick Rainier weights approximately 210 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2006 Buick Rainier is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Buick Rainier. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Rainier (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Buick Rainier | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Buick | Mini |
Model | Rainier | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 47 L |