2006 Buick Rainier vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Buick Rainier would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Buick Rainier weights approximately 72 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Rainier (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Buick Rainier | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Buick | Mini |
Model | Rainier | Countryman |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 376 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1478 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 47 L |