2006 Buick Rainier vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Buick Rainier would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Buick Rainier (376 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2006 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Buick Rainier | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Buick | Smart |
| Model | Rainier | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 291 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 376 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1867 mm |
