2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1943 Volvo PV 801-10.
Because 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | BLS | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1943 |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3260 mm |