2006 Cadillac BLS vs. 1959 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,381 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1959 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac BLS | 1959 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | BLS | 62 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1899 cc | 6381 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 325 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2040 mm |